Sponsor: Replimune Inc. (industry)
Phase: 2/3
Start date: Dec. 17, 2024
Planned enrollment: 280
RP2 is an investigational, intratumoral oncolytic immunotherapy based on herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV‑1). It is engineered to enhance direct tumor killing and stimulate systemic anti‑tumor immunity and is being evaluated primarily in a phase 1, open‑label trial (NCT04336241), including monotherapy and combinations with PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitors. As of the latest meeting reports, development has expanded to tumor‑specific cohorts (e.g., metastatic uveal melanoma) and to combinations in hepatocellular carcinoma with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. (ascopubs.org)
Dosing used in phase 1: RP2 recommended phase 2 dose is 1×10^6 PFU/mL once, then up to seven additional doses at 1×10^7 PFU/mL every 2 weeks (≤10 mL per treatment day). (ascopubs.org)
Uveal melanoma (metastatic), phase 1 cohort (ASCO 2024): Among 17 patients (most pretreated with both PD‑1 and CTLA‑4 inhibitors), overall response rate (ORR) was 29.4% (5/17; all partial responses). Disease control rate (DCR) was 58.8%. Median duration of response at data cutoff was 11.5 months (range 2.8–21.2), with some responses ongoing. Responses were seen with RP2 monotherapy (1/3) and RP2+nivolumab (4/14). (ascopubs.org)
Multi‑tumor, early phase 1 experience (ESMO 2022 poster):
These data are from nonrandomized, early‑phase cohorts; randomized studies are being planned or initiated based on these findings. (ascopubs.org)
Across phase 1 reports, RP2 alone and with nivolumab showed a generally manageable safety profile: the most common treatment‑related adverse events were grade 1–2 pyrexia, chills, fatigue, hypotension, pruritus, and influenza‑like illness. In the uveal melanoma cohort, grade 3 treatment‑related hypotension occurred in 2 patients on RP2+nivolumab; no grade 4/5 treatment‑related events were reported. ESMO 2022 reported no grade 4/5 events in the multi‑tumor experience. (ascopubs.org, oncologypro.esmo.org)
Notes: Data summarized here come from conference abstracts/posters and trial registry entries; peer‑reviewed, full‑length clinical publications may not yet be available. (ascopubs.org, oncologypro.esmo.org)
Last updated: Sep 2025
Goal: Evaluate whether intratumoral RP2 combined with nivolumab improves clinical outcomes versus the standard checkpoint combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in immune checkpoint inhibitor–naïve metastatic uveal melanoma.
Patients: Adults ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic uveal melanoma not amenable to resection, ECOG 0–1, life expectancy >6 months, LDH ≤2×ULN, adequate organ function, and at least one measurable and injectable lesion ≥1 cm (≥1.5 cm short axis for lymph nodes) suitable for serial RP2 injections. Key exclusions include any prior immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure for uveal melanoma, active CNS involvement, active significant herpetic infection or prior HSV-1 complications, need for antiherpetic antivirals, active autoimmune disease requiring systemic therapy, significant bleeding/thrombotic risk precluding intratumoral therapy, systemic immunosuppression >10 mg prednisone equivalent, active HBV/HCV/HIV, recent major surgery, recent systemic therapy/radiotherapy, or prior oncolytic virus treatment.
Design: Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2/3 treatment study with parallel arms comparing RP2+nivolumab to ipilimumab+nivolumab in ICI-naïve metastatic uveal melanoma. Approximately 280 patients will be randomized. Efficacy assessments are centrally reviewed per RECIST v1.1 with long-term follow-up for survival.
Treatments: Test arm: RP2 plus nivolumab. RP2 is an intratumoral, replication-competent HSV-1–based oncolytic immunotherapy engineered to express a fusogenic glycoprotein (GALV-GP-R−), GM-CSF, and an anti–CTLA-4 antibody-like molecule, aiming to enhance direct oncolysis and prime systemic antitumor immunity while providing local checkpoint blockade. Early-phase data in metastatic uveal melanoma and other solid tumors show manageable safety and signals of activity, including partial responses and durable disease control both as monotherapy and combined with PD-1 inhibition. Safety to date is characterized mainly by low-grade pyrexia, chills, fatigue, and flu-like symptoms, with infrequent grade 3 events; no consistent grade 4/5 RP2-related toxicities reported in early studies. Control arm: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab, a standard dual immune checkpoint regimen combining CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade used in advanced melanoma settings.
Outcomes: Co-primary endpoints are overall survival and progression-free survival by blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include safety (incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events), overall response rate, and disease control rate by central review. Time-to-event endpoints are followed up to 3 years after last dose; safety is collected through 100 days after last dose.
Burden on patient: Moderate. Patients must have an accessible injectable lesion and undergo repeated image-guided intratumoral RP2 administrations, which adds procedural visits and potential post-injection monitoring beyond standard systemic therapy. Mandatory tumor biopsies increase procedural burden and risk. Safety labs and clinic assessments are expected at regular intervals similar to standard-of-care immunotherapy, and radiographic assessments approximately every 12 weeks align with routine practice. Travel and time commitments are higher in the RP2 arm due to serial injections; the control arm resembles standard checkpoint therapy visit intensity.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients who are 18 years of age or older at the time of signed informed consent.
* Patients with confirmed diagnosis of metastatic Uveal melanoma not amenable to surgical resection.
* Has at least 1 measurable and injectable tumor of ≥ 1 cm in longest diameter (≥ 1.5 cm in the shortest axis for a lymph node \[LN\]) that is amenable to serial RP2 injections.
* Must be willing to provide tumor biopsy samples.
* LDH ≤ 2 × upper limit of normal (ULN).
* Has adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function
* Prothrombin time (PT) ≤ 1.5 × ULN (or international normalization ratio \[INR\] ≤ 1.3) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ≤ 1.5 × ULN.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1.
* Life expectancy of \> 6 months as estimated by the Investigator.
Key Exclusion Criteria:
* Any exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) since the time of first being diagnosed with uveal melanoma.
* Known acute or chronic Hepatitis B or C infection or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or any other uncontrolled infection.
* Current active significant herpetic infections or prior complications of HSV-1 infection.
* Any central nervous system (CNS) involvement of melanoma, including carcinomatous meningitis.
* Major surgery ≤ 2 weeks prior to the first dose of study intervention.
* Any bleeding, thrombotic and/or other event that places the patient at an unacceptable risk of complications of intratumoral therapy.
* Active, known, or suspected autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment.
* Prior treatment with an oncolytic virus.
* Requires intermittent or chronic use of systemic (oral or IV) antivirals with known antiherpetic activity (eg, acyclovir).
* Systemic anticancer therapy or prior radiotherapy within 2 weeks of the first dose.
* Has received Investigation agent within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever longer) prior to the first dose.
* Conditions requiring treatment with immunosuppressive doses (\> 10 mg per day of prednisone or equivalent) of systemic corticosteroids other than for corticosteroid replacement therapy within 14 days after enrollment.
Additional inclusion/ exclusion criteria are outlined in the study protocol
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Los Angeles, California, 90025, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
New York, New York, 10065, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting